Administrative Law Conference 2013
Course Date: October 28, 2013
Course Date: October 28, 2013
Welcome and Introduction
Frank A.V. Falzon, QC — Frank A.V. Falzon Law Corporation, Victoria
Angus M. Gunn, QC — Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, Vancouver
Opening Address
The Honourable Mr. Justice Marshall Rothstein — Supreme Court of Canada, Ottawa
The Year in Review: Recent Developments in Administrative Law
- standards of review
- reasons
- issue estoppel and multiple forums
- procedural fairness
- protecting solicitor-client privilege in the administrative process
- standing
- costs
David Phillip Jones, QC — de Villars Jones, Edmonton
Networking Break
Year in Review: British Columbia Case Law
- recent developments of interest in BC jurisprudence, including the ATA
Maureen E. Baird, QC — Lunny Atmore LLP, Vancouver
Karrie A. Wolfe — Ministry of Justice, Victoria
Applying Charter Values in the Administrative Justice Sphere Post-Dore
- the challenges and practical realities of integrating Charter values into the exercise of discretion and application/interpretation of statutes, particularly by adjudicative and regulatory bodies
- the scope of those Charter values and the methods by which those values can and should be balanced against legislative objectives
- challenges in dealing with self-represented litigants and decision-makers who may or may not have legal training
- should agencies, boards, and tribunals adopt court-based Charter practice or develop their own distinct approach?
- how can transparency, consistency, and coherence be assured in the development of Charter values in the administrative justice sphere?
Lorne Sossin — Dean and Professor, Osgoode Hall Law School, Toronto
Networking Lunch
Ethical Issues Before, During, and After Hearings Before Administrative Tribunals
- Code of Professional Conduct: counsel’s duties to administrative tribunals
- section 28 of the Administrative Tribunals Act and “med/arb”
- recusal of a panel member: when and how?
- counsel/board communications and issues of familiarity
- issues arising with the expiration of members’ terms
- allegations of bias and systemic bias arising from decisions
- restricting lawyer participation before tribunals
- board intervention: when is it appropriate?
John H. Shevchuk — Lex Pacifica Law Corporation, Vancouver
Cheryl L. Vickers — Chair, Property Assessment Appeal Board, Richmond
Judicial Review: Practice Overview
-
a practitioner's guide to judicial review
-
when is judicial review available?
-
who has standing and who should be named as the respondent?
-
practical considerations relating to standard of review
-
determining the grounds for judicial review
-
have adequate alternative remedies been exhausted? delay? time limits?
-
what is the nature of the order sought? remedies? costs?
Leah Greathead — Ministry of Justice, Victoria
David W. Mossop, QC — Community Legal Assistance Society, Vancouver
Networking Break
Debate: "Be it resolved that the legislature repeal ss. 44 and 45 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, which prohibit administrative tribunals from considering constitutional questions."
Moderator:
Frank A.V. Falzon, QC — Frank A.V. Falzon Law Corporation, VictoriaArguing in Favor of the Resolution:
David Phillip Jones, QC — de Villars Jones, Edmonton
Lorne Sossin — Dean and Professor, Osgoode Hall Law School, TorontoArguing Against the Resolution:
Leah Greathead — Ministry of Justice, Victoria
Geoffrey Plant, QC — Heenan Blaikie LLP, Vancouver
Closing Remarks and Wrap-up
Frank A.V. Falzon, QC — Frank A.V. Falzon Law Corporation, Victoria
Angus M. Gunn, QC — Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, Vancouver
Contributor(s):
Contributor(s):
Contributor(s):
Contributor(s):
Contributor(s):
Contributor(s):
Contributor(s):
Contributor(s):