Self-Governing Professions 2014
Course Date: April 4, 2014
Course Date: April 4, 2014
Welcome and Introduction
Lisa C. Fong — Ng Ariss Fong, Vancouver
Angela R. Westmacott, QC — Lovett Westmacott, Victoria
Admission to Practice
- assessing fitness, including capacity
- establishing or challenging character
- current issues of interest
Jean P. Whittow, QC — Barrister & Solicitor, Vancouver
Henry C. Wood, QC — Beach Avenue Barristers, Vancouver
Confidentiality and Disclosure in Investigation and Discipline
- disclosure to members, complainants, and the public
- procedural fairness and privacy concerns
- application of “open courts” principle and “deliberative secrecy” doctrine to professional regulatory bodies
- privacy, confidentiality, and disclosure under Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
- impact of external review process: disclosure requirements and non-disclosure applications before Health Professions Review Board
Jason Herbert — Davis LLP, Vancouver
Tamara Hunter — Davis LLP, Vancouver
Networking Break
Bias and Conflicts of Interest
- the difference between the concepts of conflict of interest and bias
- the tests that apply to each concept
- the effect of the “bright line rule” on regulators
- key problem spots for professional regulatory processes
Angela R. Westmacott, QC — Lovett Westmacott, Victoria
Lara C.H. Zee — Harper Grey LLP, Vancouver
Networking Lunch With Speaker: "Recent Trends in Professional Regulation"
- meta regulation and its advancement in Canada
- focus on quality assurance
- foreign professionals, substantial equivalence, and entry requirements
- emerging areas of professional regulation litigation
James T. Casey, QC — Field LLP, Edmonton
Pre-Hearing Suspensions and Other Extraordinary Remedies
- scope of duty of fairness: does it apply to an interim decision?
- is a hearing required (or advisable)?
- how should the decision maker consider the information/evidence upon which the decision is based? what standard should be applied?
- can the imposition of an extraordinary remedy impact an ongoing investigation or final hearing?
Eric Wredenhagen — Barrister & Solicitor, Vancouver
Adequacy of Reasons
- preparation and support for the “lay” panel
- relationship between counsel and the panel prior to and during the hearing
- role of independent legal counsel in decision-writing
- elements of a sound decision and the requirement for robust hearing reasons
Nitya Iyer — Lovett Westmacott, Vancouver
Networking Break
Year 2013 in Review: Key Professional Regulation Issues and Cases
- rise of good character cases
- assessing credibility (or not) at different stages of the complaints and discipline process
- Health Professions Review Board developments in the treatment of inquiry matters
- disciplining for conduct unbecoming
- disciplining for incivility
- continuing trend for robust hearing reasons
Natasha Dookie — Barrister & Solicitor; Deputy Registrar, College of Registered Nurses, Vancouver
Lisa C. Fong — Ng Ariss Fong, Vancouver
Keeping an Eye Out for Appeal or Review
- ensuring hearings comply with statutory and common law requirements
- common grounds for appeal and review
- assembling the record
The Honourable Mr. Justice Harvey M. Groberman — British Columbia Court of Appeal, Vancouver
Concluding Remarks
Lisa C. Fong — Ng Ariss Fong, Vancouver
Angela R. Westmacott, QC — Lovett Westmacott, Victoria
Contributor(s):
Contributor(s):
Contributor(s):
Contributor(s):