Criminal Law and the Charter 2005
Course Date: June 18, 2005
Course Date: June 18, 2005
Welcome and Introduction
Ward K. Branch — Branch MacMaster LLP, Vancouver
Western Canada Checkup
- statistical trends
- quirky elements
- notable case law from the four western provinces
Ward K. Branch — Branch MacMaster LLP, Vancouver (presenting paper by Wayne P. Forbes, Pollock & Company, Winnipeg)
Steven H. Leitl — Norton Rose Canada LLP, Calgary
Jason Mohrbutter — MacPherson Leslie & Tyerman LLP, Regina
Jill S. Yates — McCarthy Tetrault LLP, Vancouver
Chicken and Egg: What Pre-Certification Motions are Working and Which Aren’t?
• what kinds of motions are brought prior to certification?
• what kinds of motions are heard prior to certification?
• what kinds of motions are heard with certification?
• do the motions heard with certification bind the class?Defendant’s View: James M. Sullivan — Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP, Vancouver
Plaintiff’s View: Sharon Matthews, QC — Camp Fiorante Matthews Mogerman, Vancouver
Networking Break
Securities Class Actions: Why Aren’t They Happening in Western Canada?
• review of securities class action developments in eastern Canada
• what is the proper approach on timelines for leave?
• what are the ingredients of a successful securities class action?
• are there any barriers to securities class actions in western Canada?Jay Strosberg — Sutts, Strosberg LLP, Windsor
Access to Justice: How Should We Be Maximizing Takeup Rates?
• accessing justice in the real world—how claimants access their benefits
• the top 5 reasons why people will not access their benefits, and what can be done to fix them
• using technology to maximize notice reach and takeup ratesLaura Bruneau — Bruneau Group, Ottawa
Michael F. Mooney — Vice President, Crawford Class Action Services, Waterloo
Lunch With Featured Speaker
Paul G. Karlsgodt — BakerHostetler LLP, Denver
National Class Actions: What’s Working and What Remains To Be Solved
• the Canadian Judicial Protocol for the Management of Multijurisdictional Class Actions: in principle and in practice
• a review of the ULCC approach adopted in Alberta and Saskatchewan
• are the defendants “cutting off their nose to spite their face” when they object to national class actions?
• what, if anything, can or should be done in relation to copycat lawsuits?Andrew D. Borrell — Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP, Vancouver
Wendy Matheson — Torys LLP, Toronto
Government Class Actions: The Real Western Canadian Supertargets
• overview of recent class actions against the government: what has worked, and what has not
• practical issues in government class actions: the bureaucracy behind litigation and settlement
• but will they legislate?—the gamble inherent in all cases against the government, and how to avoid itPeter Barber — Alberta Justice and Solicitor General, Edmonton
Karen A. Horsman — Legal Services Branch, Ministry of Justice, Vancouver
Allan P. Seckel, QC — British Columbia Medical Association, Vancouver
Networking Break
Class Action Ethics Polling
• the ethics of direct settlements prior to certification
• the murky waters of fee negotiations
• disagreements between client and counsel
• and much more!Bradley W. Dixon — Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, Vancouver
David A. Klein — Klein Lyons, Vancouver
View from the Bench
The Honourable Associate Chief Justice John D. Rooke — Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta, Calgary
Closing Questions and Comments
Contributor(s):
Contributor(s):
Contributor(s):
Contributor(s):
Contributor(s):
Contributor(s):
Contributor(s):
Contributor(s):
Contributor(s):
Contributor(s):
Contributor(s):
Contributor(s):
Contributor(s):
Contributor(s):
Contributor(s):
Contributor(s):