Fundamentals of Judicial Review 2024
Course Date: May 9, 2024
Total: 4h 34min
Total Ethics: 55min
Fundamentals of Judicial Review 2024
Course Date: May 9, 2024
Total: 4h 34min
Total Ethics: 55min
Course Introduction and Land Acknowledgement (9:00 – 9:10)
Nadia Myerthall — Program Lawyer, CLEBC, Vancouver
Laurel Courtenay — Ministry of Attorney General, Legal Services Branch, Vancouver
Andrew D. Gay, KC — Gudmundseth Mickelson LLP, Vancouver
Laurel Courtenay — Ministry of Attorney General, Legal Services Branch, Vancouver
Andrew D. Gay, KC — Gudmundseth Mickelson LLP, Vancouver
The Mechanics of an Application for Judicial Review (9:10 – 10:00)
- what decisions can be challenged by way of judicial review
- who are the proper petitioner and respondent
- who do you serve
- time limits
- seeking a stay
- key elements of a petition and affidavit
- what other pleadings are needed
- managing client expectations
Meera Bennett — Ministry of Attorney General, Legal Services Branch, Vancouver
Jaime H. Hoopes — Roper Greyell LLP, Vancouver
Jaime H. Hoopes — Roper Greyell LLP, Vancouver
How to Start: Petition or Action (10:00 – 10:50)
- evidence
- role of the court
- referring petitions to trial list
- remedies
- cases on collateral attack
Brent Olthuis, KC — Olthuis van Ert, Vancouver
BREAK (10:50 – 11:05)
The Record (11:05 – 11:55)
- what is the record?
- when is evidence outside the record admissible?
- who puts the record before the court?
- how to put the record before the court
Katherine A. Hardie — BC Human Rights Tribunal, Vancouver
NETWORKING LUNCH (provided to in-person registrants) (11:55 – 12:55)
The Role of the Tribunal on Judicial Review (12:55 – 1:40)
- traditional standing: jurisdiction, standard of review, the record
- when can the tribunal play a larger role?
- costs awards
Mark G. Underhill, KC — Arvay Finlay LLP, Vancouver
A Refresher on Standard of Review (1:40 – 2:25)
- what is a standard of review
- why is it important to understand the standard of review when advising a client (including a decision-maker) and when drafting or responding to a petition
- how does reasonableness review work post-Vavilov (and what are the current exceptions to reasonableness review)?
- the standard of review if BC's Administrative Tribunals Act applies
- the standard of review on a statutory appeal
Kaitlyn Chewka — Lovett Westmacott, Victoria
BREAK (2:25 – 2:40)
Federal Court Judicial Review Practice Tips (2:40 – 3:25)
- practice tips unique to Federal Court procedures
- cases highlighting some of the unique features of the Federal Court Rules
- significant practice cases that may assist practitioners in navigating the Federal Court
Jennifer Chow, KC — Department of Justice Canada, Vancouver
Elin Sigurdson, KC — Mandell Pinder LLP, Vancouver
Elin Sigurdson, KC — Mandell Pinder LLP, Vancouver
View from the Bench: Tips for an Effective Presentation (3:25 – 3:55)
- what to think about in framing your case
- are some errors more persuasive?
- what to avoid in presenting your case to the court
Justice Neena Sharma — Supreme Court of BC, Vancouver
Closing Remarks (3:55 – 4:00)
Laurel Courtenay — Ministry of Attorney General, Legal Services Branch, Vancouver
Andrew D. Gay, KC — Gudmundseth Mickelson LLP, Vancouver
Andrew D. Gay, KC — Gudmundseth Mickelson LLP, Vancouver
Contributor(s):
Contributor(s):
Contributor(s):
Contributor(s):